@hp @Doomstrike It could also cool down more once it boots successfully. If there's not enough supply rail capacitance, one possible failure mode is the microcontroller initializes, tries to power up some hungrier parts of itself or the board, that extra current draw causes the supply rail voltage to droop, triggers brownout protection, microcontroller resets, rinse, repeat. Effectively running at 100% utilization in a boot loop, instead of initializing then being mostly in low power sleep.
@danderson @Doomstrike I have two more zip drives of a slightly different vintage that are also broken.
I'm beginning to think these devices really, really suck.
@hp @Doomstrike Skimming the history of zip drives, I'm not surprised. They had a 4-year reign between data growth making floppies impractical and CD-R taking over, and only shipped a single design in that time. Probably different manufacturing spins, but that's not a ton of time to iterate on reliability. And then in 1998 they got a class action lawsuit for high failure rates, apparently?
Certainly doesn't paint a picture of being a paragon of reliability.
@danderson @Doomstrike Well, I definitely have two models that are very, very different from each other.
All broken though :)
@danderson @hp @Doomstrike I used to own an internal 100Mb SCSI version, later on upgrading to 750Mb USB.
They were very unreliable - see "click of death".
@hp @Doomstrike Huh, all 100MB? They sold them with a bunch of different bus interfaces, so shows what I know I guess.
@danderson @Doomstrike the PCBs are completely different, as is the actual drive mechanism.
The more you know! 😄
