@thelinuxEXP so following the law in mozilla's case (they need that in the states) is bad, but taking money from neonazi supporter is OK? talk about double standards...
yes, the wording was shit, but they explained (backtracked) it.
we still haven't heard YOUR solution to financial woes of mozilla.
@lecroix74 What the hell is the relationship between what they did and taking money from neonazi supporters? What are you even talking about with this?
I also think you misunderstand: I don’t have to prove solutions. My ability to criticize doesn’t require me to have solutions either.
As per walking it back,’it doesn’t make things ok. What wait a week to say which law causes this? Why lot start with that? Why not consult the community? Same mistakes, for the past 10 years…
🍵I also think you misunderstand: I don’t have to prove solutions. My ability to criticize doesn’t require me to have solutions either.
THIS.
@rl_dane @lecroix74 This is an argument I hear so often: « oh well that’s unproductive, what are YOU offering to do? ».
It’s not my job to offer a solution. It’s not my role. I have every right to find something unacceptable without having a solution to offer to fix the issue 😂
Looking forward to your next video on the subject.
As soneone who's used Mozilla for 25 years, it's tragic to me that we're finally at the point where we have to cut our losses and tell them to get lost.
@rl_dane @lecroix74 Yeah. It could just be the usual miscommunication, but right now, they still have the rights to all the data you input. They’re one privacy policy change away from being able to do whatever they want.
I moved to Firefox as soon as I was made aware of its existence, instead of IE 6. I toughed it out for my entire computing life, as Mozilla blundered its way into irrelevance, but that’s just not acceptable anymore.